Report: Academic Board - May 28, 2026

To the Governing Council,
University of Toronto,

Your Board reports that it held a meeting on May 28, 2026 at 3:10 p.m. with the following members present:

PRESENT: Donald Ainslie (Chair), Trevor Young (Vice- President and Provost),  Leah Cowen (Vice-President, Research and Innovation, and Strategic Initiatives), Scott Mabury (Vice-President, Operations & Real Estate Partnerships and Vice-Provost, Academic Programs), Nicholas Rule (Vice-Provost, Academic Programs), Ramona Alaggia, Joshua Barker, Sheila Batacharya, Jordan Bear, Zoraida Beekhoo, Susan Bondy*, Pier Bryden, Carol Chin, Shai Cohen, Robert Cooper, Tarun Dewan*, Paul Downes*, Ramy Elitzur, Robert Gazzale*, Sandeep Gill*, Ankita Goyat, Ania Harlick, Thomas Hofmann, Walid Houry, Hibah Hussain, Sarosh Jamal, Rita Kandel, Nazanin Khazra*, Elaine Khoo, Hang-Sun Kim, Joshua Kirk, Anil Kishen, Tys Klumpenhouwer, Robert Kyle*, Marcus Law, Ben Liu*, Eha Naylor, John Oesch, Jesse Pasternak*, Lisa Robinson, Rosa Saverino, Suresh Sivanandam, Naomi Steenhof, Adam Stinchcombe, Alison Syme, Sali Tagliamonte, Kevin Temple, Luc Tremblay, Erica Walker, Colleen Zimmerman

*participated remotely via Zoom

REGRETS: Laurent Bozec (Vice-Chair), Larry Alford, Robert Austin, Mahdi Azarmi, Jay-Daniel Baghbanan, Shakhriyor Bakhtiyorov, Amanda Bartley, Bensiyon Benhabib, Gabriella Brasileiro Santos, Natalia Breuss, Christian Caron, Evan Chan, Catherine Chandler-Crichlow, Dinesh Christendat, Susan Christoffersen, Lisa Dolovich, Stanley Doyle-Wood, Markus Dubber, Christopher Essert, Monique Flaccavento, William Gough, Maureen Harquail, Zachary Hawes, Alex Hernandez, Aiyun Huang, Charles Jia, Yuyan Jiang, Charlie Keil, Gretchen Kerr, Audrey Laporte, Eden Lavallee, Ron Levi, Robert Levit, Pedro Marinho, Ryan McClelland, Henrjeta Mece, Libbie Mills, Irene Morra, Javed Mostafa, James Orbinski, Kevin O’Neill, Albert Pan, Yajan Pancholi, Reena Pattani, Anuradha Prakki, Matt Ratto, Karen Reid, Dina Reiss, Karin Ruhlandt, Creso Sá, Ali Salahpour, Kimberly Seaman, Rob Simon, Markus Stock, Robyn Stremler, Sergio Tenenbaum, Sera Tulk, Andrea Williams, Charmaine Williams, Stephen Wright, Christopher Yip,

NON-VOTING ASSESSORS: Heather Boon (Vice-Provost, Faculty & Academic Life), Christine E. Burke (Assistant Vice-President, University Planning), Mike Snowdon (Acting Assistant Vice-President, Planning and Budget), Susan McCahan (Associate Vice-President and Vice Provost, Digital Strategies and Vice-Provost, Teaching & Learning)

SECRETARIAT: Tracey Gameiro (Secretary), Samantha Frost (Governance & Projects Coordinator)

IN ATTENDANCE: Andrew Arifuzzaman (Chief Administrative Officer, UTSC), Elizabeth Church (Director, Communications & Strategic Projects), Meg Connell (Assistant Provost, Office of the Vice-President and Provost), Eyal de Lara (Chair, Department of Computer Science), Emma del Junco (Academic Reviews and Planning Specialist), Carlos Carillo Duran (Senior Planner, University Planning), Samantha Figenshaw (Faculty Relations Consultant, Office of the Vice-Provost, Faculty & Academic Life), Jennifer Francisco, (Academic Change Specialist), Cara Kedzior (Senior Planner, University Planning),  Annette Knott (Academic Change Specialist), Tim Tang (Dean, Student Experience & Wellbeing, UTSC), Sandy Welsh (Vice-Provost, Students), Greg Yantz (Director of Administration, Computer Science)

Pursuant to section 38 of By-Law Number 2,
consideration of items 19 to 29 took place in camera. 

OPEN SESSION

1. Chair’s Remarks
   
   The Chair noted this was the final meeting of the governance year and thanked members for their engagement. He also advised that, given the length of the agenda, the meeting would likely extend to 6:30 p.m., and expressed his appreciation for members’ continued participation to ensure quorum was maintained and all approval items could be considered and voted upon.
2. Report of the Vice-President and Provost
   
   Vice-President and Provost, Professor Trevor Young, presented his report to the Board, with contributions from additional members of the administration.
   
   Easy EDU
   
   Heather Boon (Vice-Provost, Faculty & Academic Life), provided an update on the settlement reached in the University’s lawsuit against Easy EDU, a tutoring company serving University of Toronto students.
   
   Members heard that Easy EDU had agreed to cease operations related to University of Toronto courses and was prohibited from using University course materials. The settlement reinforced the University’s intellectual property policies and the copyright rights of faculty members with respect to their course materials. Professor Boon acknowledged the contributions of the faculty members involved in the case and noted that students seeking academic support were encouraged to make use of the academic resources and services available across the University.
   
   Council of Ontario Universities (COU) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Task Force
   
   Further to a member’s request submitted in advance of the meeting, Professor Susan McCahan, (Vice-Provost, Teaching & Learning, and Associate Vice-President and Vice-Provost, Digital Strategies), spoke to the COU AI Task Force Report scheduled to be released May 29, 2026.
   
   Professor McCahan noted that the Report was developed through a sector-wide task force and extensive consultations involving academic, research, information technology, and administrative leaders across Ontario universities.
   
   Members heard that institutions were at varying stages of developing artificial intelligence strategies, but were collectively preparing for broader adoption of AI technologies. Common challenges identified across the sector included governance, assessment integrity, workforce training, infrastructure readiness, and the impact of AI on academic and administrative processes. It was further noted that the Report would include recommendations for governments and Ontario universities, with an emphasis on collaboration across the sector to address emerging opportunities and challenges associated with artificial intelligence.
   
   Enrolment Update
   
   The Provost provided an update on enrolment for the 2026–27 academic year. He reported that international and domestic acceptances were tracking slightly (2%) below the previous year but remained consistent with enrolment planning assumptions. He noted that the University remained on track to meet its enrolment targets and expressed optimism regarding final enrolment outcomes.
   
   Scarborough Academy of Medicine and Integrated Health (SAMIH)
   
   Professor Young highlighted developments at the Scarborough Academy of Medicine and Integrated Health (SAMIH), including the launch and expansion of programs in medicine, nursing, physical therapy, and physician assistant education. He also noted the planned opening of a nurse-practitioner clinic in partnership with the Scarborough Health Network and the expansion of the Discovery Pharmacy to the Scarborough campus.
   
   Civil Discourse
   
   Professor Young provided an update on the University’s civil discourse initiatives. He acknowledged the contributions of Professor Randy Boyagoda, whose term as Provostial Advisor on Civil Discourse would conclude on June 30, 2026 and announced the appointment of Professor Alex Hernandez as his successor, effective July 1, 2026.
   
   New Deans and Leadership Changes
   
   The Provost reported several leadership appointments, including new deans for the Faculty of Arts & Science (Professor Stephen Wright), the Faculty of Music (Professor Ryan McClelland), the Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design, (Professor Mason White), and the Vice-Principal Academic & Dean at the University of Toronto Mississauga (Professor Bill Gough). He also announced the appointments of Professor Hang-Sun Kim as Dean of Arts and Vice-Provost at Trinity College, Professor Mariana Mota Prado as Vice-Provost, Strategic Enrolment Management, and Professor Heather Boon as Deputy Provost. In addition, he advised that the Office of the Vice-Provost, Innovations in Undergraduate Education would be renamed the Office of the Vice-Provost, Teaching and Learning.
   
   The Provost informed the Board that the search for a Chief Librarian was in progress. He further advised that a review of the Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education was forthcoming and noted that Dean Gretchen Kerr was eligible for reappointment.
   
   Quercus Cybersecurity Incident
   
   Professor Young provided an update on the recent cybersecurity incident affecting the Canvas learning management system (Quercus). He reported that the University had temporarily suspended access to Quercus as a precautionary measure, that the platform had since been fully restored, and that there was no evidence that other University systems had been compromised.
   
   Supportive Leave Policy Review
   
   Professor Young invited Professor Sandy Welsh, (Vice-Provost, Students), to provide an update on the review of the Supportive Leave Policy.
   
   Professor Welsh reported on the extensive consultation process undertaken with students, faculty, librarians, staff, and other stakeholders, noting that feedback indicated the Policy was functioning effectively and was widely valued for its student-centred approach, compassionate implementation, and ability to support students while preserving their academic standing.
   
   Professor Welsh advised that consultations had also identified opportunities to improve the clarity, transparency, and administration of the Policy, including enhancing information about available supports, timelines, and the Policy’s relationship to other University policies. She noted that stakeholders had raised concerns regarding the impacts of student behaviour on the physical and psychological safety of members of the University community and that revisions to the Policy were being considered to address these concerns.
   
   Professor Welsh further reported that the University would explore opportunities to improve procedures associated with the Policy and to identify additional mechanisms to support students who may benefit from taking time away from their studies. Draft revisions would be developed over the summer, followed by further community consultation and governance review during the 2026–27 academic year.
   
   Policy on Human Rights Code Discrimination and Harassment
   
   The Provost reported that discussions with the University of Toronto Faculty Association regarding the Policy on Human Rights Code Discrimination and Harassment  were ongoing. He advised that final governance consideration of the policy had been deferred pending further consultation and that the policy was expected to return for approval during the next academic year.
   
   There were no questions from members.
3. Annual Report: Vice-President, Research and Innovation (VPRI), 2025
    
   Professor Leah Cowen, Vice-President, Research and Innovation and Strategic Initiatives, presented the 2025 VPRI Annual Report for information. The presentation highlighted the University’s continued global leadership in research, innovation and entrepreneurship, including strong international rankings, significant research funding success, commercialization activity, startup incubation, and major partnerships and research awards.
   
   The presentation also outlined key initiatives undertaken during the year, including investments in artificial intelligence computing infrastructure, the launch of the Lawson Climate Institute, expanded support for research commercialization and life sciences incubation, and the establishment of an Emergency Research Fund to mitigate the impact of U.S. research funding disruptions. The report further highlighted efforts to support researchers across all career stages, strengthen research leadership capacity, and advance interdisciplinary solutions to global challenges in areas including health, climate, artificial intelligence, sustainability, and Indigenous-led research.
   
   Discussion
   
   Professor Cowen concluded her presentation by addressing two questions submitted by Board members prior to the meeting.
   
   In response to a question regarding the University’s engagement with Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy and the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank (DSRB), Professor Cowen reported that the University was developing a defence initiative intended to support collaboration among researchers working in areas of dual-use research with both civilian and military applications. It was noted that the initiative would support partnerships with government and industry across a range of fields, including artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, health sciences, manufacturing, and public policy. Members also heard that the University had supported proposals under new federal defence innovation programs, was engaged in advocacy and discussions with government regarding emerging research opportunities, and was contributing to broader efforts to position Toronto as the home of the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank.
   
   Responding to a question regarding research ethics oversight, Professor Cowen noted that the VPRI Office regularly reviewed its guidelines and procedures to ensure alignment with university, government, and funder requirements, including within the Human Research Ethics Unit. Members were advised that the Associate Vice-President, Research Oversight and Compliance, and the Director, Human Research Ethics, were developing updated standard operating procedures and guidance documents for staff and Research Ethics Board members, which would be implemented in the coming academic year. It was also noted that the Tri-Agencies were currently updating the Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research, that feedback had been provided on the proposed changes, and that additional institutional updates might be required once the revised framework was finalized.
   
   There were no further questions for Professor Cowen.
4. Capital Project (Level 2): Report of the Project Planning Committee for the Dentistry Clinic 2 Renewal – Project Scope and Sources of Funding
    
   Professor Scott Mabury, (Vice-President Operations & Real Estate Partnerships), presented an overview of the Faculty of Dentistry Clinic 2 Renewal project, including the scope of the proposed renovations and expansions as part of the broader Clinic Master Plan.  The presentation highlighted planned improvements to patient access, accessibility, wayfinding, and reception areas, as well as enhancements to clinic and support spaces intended to support both patient experience and modernized teaching and learning environments.
   
   The presentation also addressed the project timeline and funding strategy, noting that completion was anticipated by April 2028 and that donor support was being secured.  It was further noted that the project incorporated design features to support operational flexibility and future public health requirements, and that the existing satellite clinic space would be phased out following completion of the renewal project.
   
   Planning and Budget Committee Chair, Professor Sali Tagliamonte then offered comments on the discussion that had occurred about the capital project at the Planning and Budget meeting, held on May 6, 2026.  Professor Tagliamonte reported that the Committee discussed the extent to which the renewal project would support the Faculty’s long-term clinical and educational needs.  Planning and Budget members heard that the project would modernize the facility to meet current standards for safety, privacy, accessibility, and infection control, while improving the quality and functionality of the clinical environment, including accommodations for special needs patients.  The Committee also considered future capacity and space planning considerations and noted that the project represented a cost-effective approach to optimizing and renewing critical infrastructure within the existing footprint.  Professor Tagliamonte also shared that the Committee further heard that the revitalized facility was expected to support the Faculty’s academic and clinical needs effectively for the foreseeable future.
   
   There were no questions from members.
   
   On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried
   
   YOUR BOARD RESOLVED
   
   THAT subject to confirmation by the Executive Committee,
   
   THAT the project scope of the Faculty of Dentistry Clinic 2 Renewal project as identified in the “Report of the Project Planning Committee for University of Toronto Faculty of Dentistry Clinic 2 Renewal, dated April 3, 2026 be approved in principle; and,
   
   THAT the project totaling approximately 2,945 square metres (sm) of renovated space, with a total project scope area of 3,168 sm, be approved in principle, to be funded by the Faculty of Dentistry Major Capital Projects Reserves and Future Faculty Reserves as well as by Clinic 2 Capital Donations, Central University Matching, ongoing Fundraising and Financing.
5. Capital Project (Level 2): Report of the Project Planning Committee for the Department of Computer Science at the Schwartz Reisman Innovation Campus (DCS SRIC), West – Project Scope and Sources of Funding
   
   Professor Mabury provided a presentation on the proposed relocation of the Department of Computer Science to the Schwartz Reisman Innovation Campus, including plans to renovate existing space to support the Department’s artificial intelligence research activities.  Members heard that the project was intended to foster collaboration among researchers and the broader AI community through purpose-designed academic and research space. The presentation also outlined the project timeline, including ongoing municipal approvals, anticipated construction beginning in 2026, and planned occupancy in 2027. The Board also heard that the project represented a significant investment in infrastructure to support the University’s leadership and continued growth in AI research and education.
   
   The Chair of the Planning and Budget Committee reported that the Committee discussed long-term enrolment and sector demand considerations associated with the proposal, including the potential impact of changes in the technology labour market. Members heard that demand for expertise in computer science remained strong overall, including emerging demand associated with artificial intelligence. The Committee also discussed information technology and infrastructure considerations, including operational costs and energy requirements, and heard that the project was being planned in alignment with the University’s broader energy objectives and that the Department would be responsible for associated ongoing operating costs.
   
   Discussion
   
   In response to a member’s question regarding the operation of the Schwartz Reisman Innovation Campus, members heard that the University owned the building and leased space to innovation and faculty and student startup companies connected to the University ecosystem, enabling collaborative research partnerships where students and faculty benefit from learning and career-advancement opportunities. It was noted that the building operated on a self-sustaining basis, with tenants paying market-rate rents, and was not supported by the University’s operating budget.
   
   On motion duly moved, seconded and carried,
   
   YOUR BOARD RESOLVED
   
   THAT, subject to confirmation by the Executive Committee
   
   THAT the project scope of the Department of Computer Science at Schwartz Reisman Innovation Campus - West, as identified in the “Report of the Project Planning Committee for Department of Computer Science at Schwartz Reisman Innovation Campus - West”, dated March 27, 2026, be approved in principle; and
   
   THAT the project totaling 3,486 gross square metres (gsm), 1,588 net assignable square metres (nasm) to be funded through: Faculty of Arts & Science: Future Major Capital Projects Reserves 107944.
6. Capital Project (Level 3): Project Development Report for the Build More Housing Initiative (BMHI): On-Campus Housing – Real Estate Partnership – Project Scope and Sources of Funding
   
   The Board received a presentation on the Build More Housing Initiative, including plans to expand student housing capacity through a joint venture partnership model.  Members heard about the significant demand for student housing, particularly for graduate and upper-year students, and the importance of increasing housing supply to support student experience at the University.  The presentation also outlined the proposed development of approximately 1,200 new beds across the Harbord Street and College Street sites, as well as the procurement process undertaken to identify a private sector partner.  Members further heard that the proposed projects were intended to improve affordability while providing a range of housing options designed in accordance with the University’s long-term design and sustainability objectives.
   
   The Chair of the Planning and Budget Committee reported that the Committee discussed the rationale for the proposed mix of accommodation types and heard that the design had been informed by analysis of student housing needs and preferences, as well as research relating to student experience and academic success. Members also discussed the project’s financial model and heard that the initiative was intended to advance student housing development through an alternative delivery model that would not rely on provincial government funding support. The Committee further discussed community consultation and engagement efforts and heard that the University remained committed to ongoing engagement with local stakeholders and community groups as the project progressed.
   
   There were no questions from members.
   
   On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried
   
   YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDED
   
   THAT the project scope of the Build More Housing Initiative: On-Campus Housing - Real Estate Partnership - Total Project Cost & Sources of Funding, described in the  “Build More Housing Initiative Project Development report On-Campus Housing dated April 22, 2026” for Student Residence Projects at 40-56 Harbord Street and 167-171 College Street be approved in principle; and,
   
   THAT the project totaling approximately 37,165 square metres (sm) of gross floor area of student residence and amenity space with a total project gross construction area of 40,684 sm be approved in principle, to be funded by the Joint Venture Partnership.
7. Capital Project (Level 3): Report of the Project Planning Committee for the University of Toronto Scarborough (UTSC) Field House – Project Scope and Sources of Funding (Presentation)
   
   Tim Tang, (Dean, Student Experience & Wellbeing, UTSC) presented an overview of the proposed UTSC Field House project, including its background, alignment with the campus master plan, proposed space program, and anticipated timeline. Andrew Arifuzzaman (Chief Administrative Officer, UTSC), also offered comments. The presentation highlighted the project’s role in addressing growing demand for recreation, wellness, and student gathering space at UTSC as enrolment continues to increase and existing facilities approach capacity. The proposed facility would include indoor athletic and recreation space, student study and lounge areas, flexible programming space, and areas to support student clubs and events. The project was described as supporting UTSC’s Healthy Campus and Culture of Care priorities and strengthening opportunities for student engagement and wellbeing. Construction was anticipated to begin in 2027, with occupancy targeted for May 2029, subject to approvals and permitting.
   
   In the absence of the Chair of the UTSC Campus Council, the Academic Board Chair provided an overview of the Council’s discussion regarding the project. The Chair reported that the Council had voted to recommend the UTSC Field House Capital Project to the Academic Board for consideration. Members of Council noted that the project would significantly expand sports and recreation facilities at UTSC in response to substantial enrolment growth and increasing demand for student recreation space. The Council discussed the project’s revenue-generating potential through external rentals while ensuring priority access for students. Council members also discussed the project’s sustainability features, including its low-energy consumption design. Overall, the UTSC Campus Council viewed the Field House as an important infrastructure investment that would help provide UTSC students with sports and recreation facilities comparable to those available at the St. George campus.
   
   Discussion
   
   In response to members’ questions, Mr. Arifuzzaman provided additional information regarding site conditions and project design. Members heard that the project site was adjacent to a former landfill area and that extensive environmental assessment and exploratory work had been undertaken to identify and mitigate potential risks. It was noted that methane mitigation measures would be incorporated into the project design and that previous remediation work completed on the campus had significantly reduced environmental concerns. Members were advised that contingency planning and environmental management strategies would continue to be refined as the project advanced.
   
   Mr. Arifuzzaman also responded to questions regarding the proposed fieldhouse design. He advised that artificial turf was planned for the facility and that a tensile roof system had been identified as the preferred design option because of its structural efficiency and ability to provide consistent natural lighting. Members heard that bidders would have the opportunity to propose alternative roof systems through the procurement process, which would be evaluated as part of the project's detailed design review.
   
   On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried
   
   YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDED 
   
   THAT the project scope of the UTSC Field House, as identified in the Report of the Project Planning Committee for UTSC Field House, dated April 10, 2026, be approved in principle; and
   
   THAT the project totaling 7,194 gross square metres (6,332 net assignable square metres), be approved in principle to be funded through the UTSC Athletic Centre Facility Levy.
8. St. George Campus Plan, 2040
   
   The Board received a presentation on the proposed St. George Campus Plan, 2040 from Christine Burke, (Assistant Vice President, University Planning).  Ms. Burke explained that the Plan represented a comprehensive long-term framework to guide campus growth, development, and public realm planning over the next 15 years.  Members heard that the Plan had been shaped through extensive consultation and engagement with the University community and external stakeholders, as well as studies examining campus public life, outdoor space, and connectivity. The presentation highlighted the Plan’s vision for a more connected, sustainable, inclusive, and student-centred campus, including strategies to support academic growth, student housing, innovation space, and enhanced pedestrian and public realm connections. Members further heard that the Plan was intended to provide flexible guidance for future campus development while aligning with the University’s broader planning policies, sustainability goals, and long-term institutional priorities.
   
   Members were advised that future capital projects would continue to engage through project-specific committees, stakeholder consultations, and existing advisory and consultation bodies, including the Community Liaison Committee and the University Design Review Committee.
   
   Discussion
   
   In response to members’ questions regarding the Campus Plan, Ms. Burke emphasized that the plan had been designed with flexibility to accommodate changing institutional priorities, funding opportunities, and broader city developments over time. Members heard that the planning approach intentionally avoided being overly prescriptive and instead focused on providing a flexible framework to guide future campus growth and development. Ms. Burke acknowledged the value of periodically reviewing the plan’s implementation to ensure that it continued to meet the University’s needs.
   
   Responding to questions about transportation and mobility, Ms. Burke advised that the plan incorporated the concept of ‘shared streets’, particularly on the west campus, with the goal of prioritizing pedestrians and cyclists, enhancing campus life, and creating a safer and more integrated public realm while maintaining necessary vehicle access.
   
   Members also heard that the plan sought to strengthen campus connectivity while respecting the distinct character and community functions of the colleges and other campus spaces. The proposed approach would support a more cohesive campus experience through improvements to the public realm, enhanced indoor-outdoor connections, active ground uses and shared spaces while preserving existing college identities and community networks.
   
   On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried
   
   YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDED
   
   THAT the Campus Master Plan for the St. George Campus be approved in principle. 
9. Policy Review: Amendments to the Policy on Academic Continuity
   
   The Board received a presentation regarding proposed amendments to the University’s Policy on Academic Continuity from Professor Nicholas Rule, (Vice-Provost, Academic Programs). Background was provided on the development of the Policy during the 2011–2012 academic year as part of a broader review of grading and academic policies, including recommendations arising from the University Ombudsperson’s review of grading practices.
   
   It was noted that the Policy was originally established to provide a framework for maintaining academic continuity during significant disruptions, including public health emergencies and labour disputes, while upholding the University’s academic mission, the integrity of academic programs, and fairness to students. Examples of past uses of the Policy, including during the COVID-19 pandemic and labour disruptions, were reviewed.
   
   The Board was advised that the proposed amendments resulted from discussions between the administration and the University of Toronto Faculty Association and were informed by experience gained through implementation of the Policy. The revisions were described as clarifying, rather than changing, the intent or scope of the Policy.
   
   Key amendments included clarifying the scope of the Policy and the circumstances under which an academic disruption may be declared; outlining considerations and communication expectations associated with such declarations; affirming the academic freedom of faculty members; and clarifying the responsibilities of instructors and academic leadership in preparing for and responding to disruptions. The proposed changes also clarified that faculty members and librarians would not be required to perform the duties of employees legally engaged in a work stoppage during a labour dispute.
   
   Professor Walid Houry, Chair of the Committee on Academic Policy & Programs (AP&P), was then invited to report on the Committee’s discussion of the proposal. Professor Houry reported that AP&P engaged in a discussion regarding the supports available to instructors in fulfilling their responsibilities under the Policy. Members also discussed escalation pathways in the event of disruptions and heard clarification regarding the respective roles of academic leaders, the Provost, and Academic Board. The Committee further discussed considerations relating to accredited programs, including potential implications of course changes in professional programs such as engineering.
   
   Discussion
   
   In response to members’ questions regarding the proposed amendments to the Policy on Academic Continuity, members heard that the changes reflected extensive consultation and agreement with the University of Toronto Faculty Association. It was noted that the Association had approved the amendments through its own governance processes and would continue to be informed as the policy progressed through University governance.
   
   Members also sought clarification regarding the authority to declare an academic disruption. It was explained that, under the policy, both the Provost and Academic Board had the authority to declare a disruption, although such declarations had historically been made by the Provost.
   
   Responding to questions about the timing of the proposed amendments, members were advised that the University had maintained an Academic Continuity Policy since 2012 and had actively relied upon it when required. The current amendments were intended to provide greater clarity and reflect lessons learned through the policy’s implementation, following several years of discussion and consultation.
   
   On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried
   
   YOUR BOARD RESOLVED
   
   THAT the proposed amendment to the Policy on Academic Continuity, 2012, be approved, effective immediately.
10. New Graduate Program Proposal: Master of Physician Assistant Studies, Temerty Faculty of Medicine
    
    Professor Rule provided the Board with an overview of the proposal from the Temerty Faculty of Medicine for a new Master of Physician Assistant Studies.
    
    The presentation explained that the proposed professional master’s program would replace the existing Bachelor of Science in Physician Assistant program, aligning the University’s offering with evolving national standards.  Admissions to the current bachelor’s program would be suspended effective Fall 2027 following the launch of the new degree.
    
    Members heard that the cohort-based program would consist of 6.0 full-course equivalents delivered full-time over six sessions through a hybrid format combining online instruction, in-person learning, and clinical placements across Ontario.  The curriculum would include integrated study in medical foundations, clinical and procedural skills, professional competencies, and research with the second year focused primarily on clinical placements and a research project.
    
    The presentation also noted that the program would admit approximately 85 students annually, with in-person delivery taking place at the University of Toronto Scarborough within the Scarborough Academy of Medicine and Integrated Health.  Graduates were expected to be well-positioned for employment across diverse healthcare settings, supported by strong labour market demand and high employment rates among graduates of the existing bachelor’s program.
    
    It was further noted that consultations had taken place with external stakeholders, including the U of T Council of Health Science Deans, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Accreditation Canada, and the Ontario Ministry of Health, all of whom supported the proposal.
    
    The Chair of AP&P reported that the Committee expressed strong support for the proposed Master of Physician Assistant Studies program. Members discussed clinical placement opportunities and heard that placements would occur primarily in hospitals and clinics, including placements in Northern Ontario in recognition of regional healthcare needs. The Committee also discussed the opportunities associated with locating the program at UTSC, student research project timelines and milestone management, and the proposed approach to advanced standing for graduates of the Bachelor of Science Physician Assistant program.
    
    No questions were received from Academic Board members regarding the proposal.
    
    On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried
    
    YOUR BOARD RESOLVED
    
    THAT, subject to confirmation by the Executive Committee
    
    THAT the proposed Master of Physician Assistant Studies, as described in the proposal from the Temerty Faculty of Medicine dated March 23, 2026 be approved effective September 1, 2027.

OPEN SESSION CONSENT AGENDA

On motion duly moved, seconded, and carried 

YOUR BOARD RESOLVED

THAT the consent agenda be adopted.

11. Report of the Previous Meeting: Report Number 262 – April 16, 2026
    
    
    Report Number 262, from the meeting of April 16, 2023 was approved.
12. Business Arising from the Report of the Previous Meeting
    
    There was no business arising from the report of the previous meeting.
13. Items for Information
    
    Members received the following items for information:
    1. Annual Report: Council of Ontario Universities Academic Colleague, 2026
    2. Semi-Annual Report: Academic Appeals Committee, Individual Reports, Spring 2026
    3. Semi-Annual Report: University Tribunal, Information Reports, Spring 2026
    4. Report Number 323 of the Agenda Committee – May 19, 2026
    5. Report Number 234 of the Committee on Academic Policy and Programs – May 12, 2026
    6. Report Number 221 of the Planning and Budget Committee – May 6, 2026
14. Quarterly Report on Donations of $250,000 or more to the University of Toronto - February 1, 2026-April 30, 2026)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Donations of $250,000 or more was received for information.
15. Revision to the Statement of Acknowledgement of Traditional Land
    
    The revision to the Statement of Acknowledgement of Traditional Land was received for information.
16. Revised Teaching Evaluation Guidelines for the University of Toronto (UTSC)
    
    The UTSC Teaching Evaluation Guidelines were received for information.

17. Date of the Next Meeting: October 8, 2026, 3:10-5:10 p.m.
    
    The Chair reminded members that the next meeting of the Board was scheduled for October 8, 2026 at 3:10 p.m.

18. Other Business
    
    There were no items of other business.

END OF OPEN SESSION CONSENT AGENDA

THE BOARD MOVED IN CAMERA.

IN CAMERA CONSENT AGENDA

On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried

YOUR BOARD RESOLVED 

THAT the in camera consent agenda be adopted and that the items requiring approval (items 19-22) be approved.

19. Appointments: University Professors Recipients
    
    On motion duly moved, seconded and carried 
    
    YOUR BOARD RESOLVED
    
    THAT Professor Roberto Abraham, Professor John Borrows, and Professor Nicholas Terpstra, be promoted to the rank of University Professor as of July 1, 2026.
20. Appointments: President’s Teaching Award Recipients
    
    On motion duly moved, seconded and carried 
    
    YOUR BOARD RESOLVED
    
    THAT Professor Mairi Cowan, Professor Robin Elliott, Professor Robert Irish, Professor Michael Reid, and Professor Olivier St-Cyr receive the President’s Teaching Award for 2025-2026. 
21. Annual Report: Nominating Committee for the University of Toronto Tribunal and Academic Appeals Committee, 2026-2027
    
    On motion duly moved, seconded and carried 
    
    YOUR BOARD RESOLVED
    
    THAT Mr. Simon Clements, Mr. Nader Hasan, Mr. Michael Hines, and Mr. Paul Morrison be re-appointed as Chairs of the University Tribunal for a three-year term from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2029; and,
    
    THAT Ms Teresa Donnelly and Mr. Samuel Greene be appointed as Chairs of the University Tribunal for a three-year term from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2029.
    
    THAT Dr. Hadiya Roderique be appointed as a Chair of the Academic Appeals Committee for a two-year term from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2028; and,
    
    THAT Professor Malcolm Thorburn be appointed as a Chair of the Academic Appeals Committee for a three-year term from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2029.
22. Appointment of Discipline Counsel
    
    On motion duly moved, seconded and carried 
    
    YOUR BOARD RESOLVED
    
    THAT Charlotté Calon be appointed Discipline Counsel, effective immediately.
23. Project Completion Report
    
    The Project Completion Report covering May 1, 2023 to April 30, 2026 was received for information.

IN CAMERA AGENDA
 

24. Capital Project (Level 2): Report of the Project Planning Committee for the Dentistry Clinic 2 Renewal - Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding
    
    On motion duly moved, seconded and carried
    
    YOUR BOARD RESOLVED
    
    THAT subject to confirmation by the Executive Committee,
    
    THAT the recommendation of the Vice-President, Operations and Real Estate Partnerships, as outlined in the memorandum dated May 21, 2026, regarding the Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding for the Dentistry Clinic 2 Renewal, be approved in principle.
25. Capital Project ( Level 2): Report of the Project Planning Committee for the Department of Computer Science at the Schwartz Reisman Innovation Campus – Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding
    
    On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried 
    
    YOUR BOARD RESOLVED,
    
    THAT subject to confirmation by the Executive Committee,
    
    THAT the recommendation of the Vice-President, Operations and Real Estate Partnerships, as outlined in the memorandum dated May 21, 2026, regarding the Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding for the Department of Computer Science at Schwartz Reisman Innovation Centre - West, be approved in principle.
26. Capital Project (Level 3): Project Development Report for the Build More Housing Initiative  - Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding
    
    On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried 
    
    YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDED
    
    THAT the recommendation of the Vice-President, Operations and Real Estate Partnerships, as outlined in the memorandum dated May 21, 2026, regarding the Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding for the Build More Housing Initiative, be approved in principle.
27. Capital Project (Level 3): Report of the Project Planning Committee for the University of Toronto Scarborough Field House  - Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding
    
    On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried 
    
    YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDED
    
    THAT the recommendation of the Vice-President, Operations and Real Estate Partnerships, as outlined in the memorandum dated May 21, 2026, regarding the Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding for the University of Toronto Scarborough Field House, be approved in principle.
28. Capital Project (Level 3): Report of the Project Planning Committee for the Academic Wood Tower – Revised Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding
    
    On a motion duly moved, seconded, and carried 
    
    YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDED
    
    THAT the recommendation of the Vice-President, Operations and Real Estate Partnerships, as outlined in the memorandum dated May 21, 2026, regarding the Revised Total Project Cost and Sources of Funding for the Academic Wood Tower, be approved in principle.
29. Annual Report: Striking Committee – Academic Board, 2026
    
    On a motion duly moved, seconded and carried
    
    YOUR BOARD APPROVED
    
    THAT the following be appointed  to the Board and its Committees for a one-year term from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027, unless otherwise specified.
    
    2026-2027 Non-Governing Council Membership of the Academic Board
    
    Administrative and Professional Staff
    
    Elizabeth Bohnert, Communications & Outreach Manager, Office of the Vice-Principal Academic & Dean (UTM) (three year term: July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2029)
    
    Alumni
    
    Terese Weisberg, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work
    
    Students - Full-time Undergraduate
    
    Mustafa Gogkcek, UTM (Economics)
    Winston Ukpong, UTSC (Psychology)
    Yumna Zehra, UTSC (Political Science)
    Hibah Hussain, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering*
    Stephanie Chan, New College (Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology)
    Seoyeon Choi, Leslie Dan Faculty of Medicine
    Jiayi Du, Faculty of Information
    
    Students - Graduate
    
    Pedro Marinho, Temerty Faculty of Medicine*
    Kimberly Seaman, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering*
    Luis Sanchez Dias, Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy
    Friedemann Krannich, Faculty of Arts & Science (Mathematics)
    
    Membership of Committees of the Board
    
    On a motion duly moved, seconded and carried 
    
    YOUR  BOARD APPROVED 
    
    THAT the following be appointed to committees of the Board 
    
    2026– 2027 Committee on Academic Policy and Programs (AP&P)
    
    Administrative Staff
    
    Ben Liu, Executive Director, School of Cities*
    
    Alumni
    
    Terese Weisberg, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work
    
    Students - Full-time Undergraduate
    
    Winston Ukpong, UTSC (Psychology)
    Stephanie Chan, New College (Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology)
    Jiayi Du, Faculty of Information
    
    Students - Graduate
    
    Luis Sanchez Dias, Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy
    Pedro Marinho, Temerty Faculty of Medicine*
    
    Teaching Staff
    
    Adam Stinchcombe, Faculty of Arts & Science, Department of Mathematics, Governor, was recommended to serve as Chair
    Pier Bryden, Faculty of Medicine, was recommended as Vice-Chair (past AP&P member)
    Jordan Bear, Faculty of Arts & Science (Art History) (past AP&P member)
    Robyn Stremler, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing (Dean)
    Sergio Tenenbaum, UTM (Philosophy)
    Irene Morra, St. Michael’s College (Principal)
    Carol Chin, Woodsworth College (Principal)
    Julie Garlen, OISE
    Karen Reid, Faculty of Arts & Science (Computer Science) (past AP&P member)
    Charmaine Williams, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (Dean)
    Shyon Baumann, Faculty of Arts & Science (Sociology)
    Susan Bondy, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (past AP&P member)
    Rita Kandel, Temerty Faculty of Medicine (past AP&P member)
    Tarun Dewan, UTSC (Management)
    Ania Harlick, Faculty of Arts & Science (Physics)
    
    2026 – 2027 Planning and Budget Committee
    
    Administrative Staff
    
    Kevin Temple, Director, Strategic Content, Office of Advancement*
    
    Alumni
    LGIC
    
    Two government appointees governors will serve on P&B in 2026-2027.  As such, no co-opted alumni members were needed.
    
    Students
    
    Hibah Hussain, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering*
    
    Teaching Staff
    
    Sali Tagliamonte, Faculty of Arts & Science, was recommended as Chair (past P&B member)*
    Anuradha Prakki, Faculty of Dentistry, was recommended as Vice-Chair (past P&B member)*
    Joshua Barker, School of Graduate Studies (Dean)     
    Lisa Dolovich, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy (Dean) (past P&B member)
    Christopher Essert, Faculty of Law (Dean)        
    Robert Gazzale, Faculty of Arts & Science, New College (past P&B member)
    Paul Downes, Faculty of Arts & Science (English)
    Reena Pattani, Temerty Faculty of Medicine
    John Oesch, Rotman School of Management (past P&B member)
    Matt Ratto, Faculty of Information (past P&B member)
    
    Additional Members of the Agenda Planning Group
    
    John Oesch, Rotman School of Management (past P&B member)
    Matt Ratto, Faculty of Information (past P&B member)
    
    2026 – 2027 Agenda Committee
    
    Student
    
    Friedemann Krannich, Faculty of Arts & Science (Mathematics)
    
    Teaching Staff
    
    Luc Tremblay, Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education
    Alison Syme, UTM (Visual Studies)
    
    2026 – 2027 Discipline Appeals Board
    
    YOUR BOARD APPROVED 
    
    THAT the following be appointed to the Discipline Appeals Board for 2026-2027:
    
    Students
    
    Eden Lavalle, UTSC (Undergraduate Student, Management and International Business)
    Evan Chan, Faculty of Arts & Science (PhD)
    Liam Dravid, Faculty of Information (Master of Information Science - Information Systems Design and Artificial Intelligence)
    
    Teaching Staff
    Ramona Alaggia, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, (past DAB member)*
    Adam Stinchcombe, Faculty of Arts & Science, (past DAB member)*
    Jesse Pasternak, Temerty Faculty of Medicine (past DAB member)*
    
    2026– 2027 Advisory Committee on the University of Toronto Library System
    
    YOUR BOARD APPROVED THAT
    
    THAT the following be re-appointed as the Board's representatives on the Advisory Committee on the University of Toronto Library System for 2026- 2027:
    
    Matt Ratto, Faculty of Information (past UTL member)
    Henrjeta Mece, OISE

*2025-2026 Members of the Academic Board

The Board returned to Open Session.