Case 817

DATE:

April 19, 2016

PARTIES:

University of Toronto v H.F.L.

Hearing Date(s):

March 3, 2016

Panel Members:

Rodica David, Chair
Joel Kirsh, Faculty Member
Sean McGowan, Student Member

Appearances:

Lily Harmer, Assistant Discipline Counsel
Lucy Gaspini, Manager, Academic Integrity & Affairs, Office of the Dean, University of Toronto Mississauga
Sherna Tamboly, Counsel for the Student, Downtown Legal Services

In Attendance:

Mr. H.F.L., the Student
Krista Osbourne, Administrative Assistant, Appeals, Discipline and Faculty Grievances
 
Student charged under s. B.i.1(b) of the Code. The charges related to allegations that the Student knowingly obtained unauthorized assistance in a Course Assignment. After the Course Instructor discovered that the computer systems showed no record of the Student accessing the system to complete the assignment, the Student admitted that he had obtained unauthorized assistance to complete it from a friend who had previously completed the Course.
 
Based on the Agreed Statement of Facts, the Panel found the Student guilty of the unauthorized aid charge. The Panel noted that the Student had two prior offences, emphasizing that the sanction needed to be significant to reflect the seriousness of not only the offence itself, but also the fact that it was a third offence. The Panel did not accept Counsel’s submission that there was no likelihood of repetition because the Student was in a position to graduate after the offence was dealt with, noting that if the Student wished to go onto post graduate work, repetition of the offence could occur.  The Panel accepted the Joint Submission on Penalty, but it noted that if the requirements for not accepting a Joint Submission on Penalty were not as stringent as they were, it might have considered backdating the suspension farther back than agreed to by the parties in order to avoid penalizing the Student for the delay in the Tribunal. The Panel imposed a grade assignment of zero in the Course; a 3-year suspension; the earlier of either a 4-year notation on the Student’s academic record and transcript, or a notation until his graduation from the University; and that the case be reported to the Provost for publication.